Madras High Court in K. Murugan vs. the Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies & Others W.P.No.25505 of 2009, held that when the employee was terminated with a stigmatic order and if it is not a termination simpliciter, then the employer was duty bound to conduct an enquiry in the manner known to law by providing an opportunity to the employee to refute the allegations against him.


You may also like
News Section
Exemption from TN permanent status to workmen Act is limited to workmen engaged in construction activities exclusively and not otherwise: SC
06/19/2024
04/28/2023
News Section
Bombay High Court grants compensation to BATA salesmen fired for opposing showrooms opening 7 Days a week with extended hours
11/04/2023
Author
Notifications
- Maharashtra Government Revises Minimum Wages w.e.f 01/07/2025
- U. P. Factories Amendment Rules 2025
- Bihar Factories Amendment Rules 2025
- Meghalaya Revised Minimum Wages from 1.04.2025
- EDLI Amendment Scheme 2025 w.e.f. 18.07.2025
- Dadra Nagar Haveli Daman Dieu Shops Rules 2025
- M.P. Exempts Women Night Working
- Raj. Govt. Permits Women Working in Night Under Shops Act
Add comment