Madras HC in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs. Colorplus Fashions Ltd. and Ors. W.P. No. 18104/2012, while holding that the attendance bonus would qualify as ‘bonus’ for the purpose of exclusion from Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act“) observed that ‘attendance bonus’ is an inducement amount paid to the employees who reported to the work regularly without absenting themselves and without availing any leave and if an employee failed to turn up for the required number of days, and thus the nature of ‘attendance bonus’ is (a) found to be variable; (b) not common; (c) not granted by all industrial concerns and (d) not paid to all employees within an industrial concern.


You may also like
03/01/2022
08/17/2023
03/15/2023
Author
Notifications
- UP Factories Amendment Act 2025 effective from 3.10.25
- Tamil Nadu Shops Act Amendments About Combined Annual Return
- Haryana Revised Minimum Wages from 1.11.25
- Chhattisgarh Government Amends Shops & Establishments Rules to Permit Women in Night Shifts w.e.f. 25.09.2025
- EPFO Mandates Display of Form 5A by Establishments
- Kerala MW Extended to New Employments and Kerala Factories Amendment Rules 2025
- Maharashtra Govt Amends Shops & Estab. Act w.e.f 1-10-25
- UP Minimum Wages – 1-10-2025



Add comment