Madras HC in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs. Colorplus Fashions Ltd. and Ors. W.P. No. 18104/2012, while holding that the attendance bonus would qualify as ‘bonus’ for the purpose of exclusion from Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act“) observed that ‘attendance bonus’ is an inducement amount paid to the employees who reported to the work regularly without absenting themselves and without availing any leave and if an employee failed to turn up for the required number of days, and thus the nature of ‘attendance bonus’ is (a) found to be variable; (b) not common; (c) not granted by all industrial concerns and (d) not paid to all employees within an industrial concern.


You may also like
02/16/2026
05/08/2026
News Section
Reinstatement when granted would accompany with grant of continuity of service: Gujarat High Court
03/08/2022
Author
May 2026

Notifications
- Revision of Minimum Wages Notification 01.05.2026
- UP Revised Minimum Wages from 01.04.2026
- The Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act 1958
- Revised Minimum Wages of Haryana with effect from 01.04.2026
- MP Minimum Wage 01-04-2026 to 30-09-2026
- Uttar Pradesh Minimum Wages Notification April 2026 to Sept. 2026
- Delhi Shops Amendment Act 2026
- Gujarat Shops Act Amendment 2026


Add comment