Madras HC in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs. Colorplus Fashions Ltd. and Ors. W.P. No. 18104/2012, while holding that the attendance bonus would qualify as ‘bonus’ for the purpose of exclusion from Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act“) observed that ‘attendance bonus’ is an inducement amount paid to the employees who reported to the work regularly without absenting themselves and without availing any leave and if an employee failed to turn up for the required number of days, and thus the nature of ‘attendance bonus’ is (a) found to be variable; (b) not common; (c) not granted by all industrial concerns and (d) not paid to all employees within an industrial concern.


You may also like
12/27/2022
03/01/2022
12/06/2022
Author
Notifications
- Rectification of Erroneous EPS Contributions
- POSH Compliance Check List for Gurugram Workplaces
- Punjab Minimum Wages from 1.9.25
- Gujarat Shops and Establishments (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025
- The Rajasthan Shops And Commercial Establishments (Amendment) Ordinance 2025
- Erroneous EPS Contribution Rectification
- Minimum Wages Odisha w.e.f. 01-10-2025
- IR Code Implementation Notification



Add comment