Madras HC in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs. Colorplus Fashions Ltd. and Ors. W.P. No. 18104/2012, while holding that the attendance bonus would qualify as ‘bonus’ for the purpose of exclusion from Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act“) observed that ‘attendance bonus’ is an inducement amount paid to the employees who reported to the work regularly without absenting themselves and without availing any leave and if an employee failed to turn up for the required number of days, and thus the nature of ‘attendance bonus’ is (a) found to be variable; (b) not common; (c) not granted by all industrial concerns and (d) not paid to all employees within an industrial concern.
You may also like
News Section
After promotion, disabled Employee entitled to Posting at Same Place under policy : Calcutta High Court
08/28/2025
News Section
Despite Contributions Deducted From Employees’ Salaries, They Weren’t Deposited With ESIC: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction U/S 85(A) ESI Act
04/18/2025
01/05/2024
Author
October 2026

Notifications
- EPFO Initiates Prompt Interest Credit at 8.25% for FY 2025-26
- West Bengal Revises Minimum Wages w.e.f 1/07/2026
- Revision of Minimum Wages Notification 01.05.2026
- UP Revised Minimum Wages from 01.04.2026
- The Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act 1958
- Revised Minimum Wages of Haryana with effect from 01.04.2026
- MP Minimum Wage 01-04-2026 to 30-09-2026
- Uttar Pradesh Minimum Wages Notification April 2026 to Sept. 2026


Add comment