On March 11, 2022, The Delhi High Court in Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital Govt. of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. vs. Dr. Krati Mehrotra W.P.C. No. 1278/2020 while examining the admissibility of maternity benefit to a female ad-hoc employee whose contract was extended from time to time, observed that the employer cannot escape its obligation to pay benefits under the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 even for a period that spills beyond the tenure of the contract as long as conception occurs before the tenure of the expiry of the employment contract. The Court also ignored the contrary judgement delivered in Dr Kavita Yadav vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Department & Ors., for the reason that it dealt with a fixed term contract.
News Section
Contract employee is entitled to maternity benefit even after her period ends: Delhi HC
03/17/2022


You may also like
News Section
TresVista to hire 150+ employees in the next 3 months for its Research and Investment Services Department
05/17/2022
News Section
TN ex-DGP Rajesh Das, convicted of sexual harassment, told to take compulsory retirement
12/06/2023
News Section
91% of Indian companies are comfortable with using AI tools, Companies plan to increase AI spending in 2025: Report
12/18/2024
Author
Notifications
- UP Factories Amendment Act 2025 effective from 3.10.25
- Tamil Nadu Shops Act Amendments About Combined Annual Return
- Haryana Revised Minimum Wages from 1.11.25
- Chhattisgarh Government Amends Shops & Establishments Rules to Permit Women in Night Shifts w.e.f. 25.09.2025
- EPFO Mandates Display of Form 5A by Establishments
- Kerala MW Extended to New Employments and Kerala Factories Amendment Rules 2025
- Maharashtra Govt Amends Shops & Estab. Act w.e.f 1-10-25
- UP Minimum Wages – 1-10-2025



Add comment