Telangana High Court in A. Rajaram Reddy vs. Additional Collector/PIC Chairman Karimnagar Cooperative Urban Bank & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 4307 of 2024), recently held that employers cannot impose punishments not prescribed under statutory rules. The court observed that if an employee is...
Layout B (with infinite scroll)
News Section
Compensation to be granted if employee attains retirement age in case of illegal retrenchment: Bom. HC
Bombay High Court in J Fibre Corporation vs. Maruti Harishchandra Amrute (Writ Petition No. 10454 of 2024), recently ruled that employers must adhere to proper retrenchment procedures outlined in the ID Act, even when valid business reasons exist for reducing staff. The court observed that the...
Bombay High Court in Deepak VallabhdasIntwala vs. Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 3428 of 2022), recently dismissed the employee’s claim, holding that claims under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“ID Act“) must be based on clear...
News Section
Employee resignation cannot be accepted with back date if withdrawn before acceptance: P&H HC
Punjab & Haryana High Court in B.B. Gupta vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Union Territory Chandigarh & Anr. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10280-2001), recently ruled that once an employee withdraws his resignation, the employer loses the jurisdiction to accept it retrospectively to...
News Section
Single inquiry for multiple employees possible if the disciplinary authority in common: Raj. HC
Rajasthan High Court, in Shri Manish Kumar Balwani & Ors. vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17059/2024), on March 18, 2025ruled that a composite disciplinary hearing can only be conducted if all delinquent employees share the same competent and disciplinary authority...
