In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the dismissal of an employee, emphasizing that a history of prior misconduct justifies termination even if the final charge is minor. This judgment reinforces that continuous misbehavior and disciplinary issues can provide grounds...
Layout C (with load more button)
When the workman was not reinstatement at his last place of employment, it would be construed that order of reinstatement was not complied by the Management.
Delhi HC in Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. vs. D.P. Sharma CM APPL. 16153/2023, dismissed the petition of an employee claiming voluntary resignation benefits on a higher pay scale, which was based on a single bench’s judgment that had set aside the order imposing punishment on the employee. The...
High court scope of interference in disciplinary proceedings is very limited: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court in the Sumer Singh vs. the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-Cum labour Court, Rohtak and Ors. CWP 14078/2000,on October 14, 2024, upheld the dismissal of an employee who had faced 52 departmental proceedings over 18 years and committed embezzlement even during...
Madras High Court in the Management, Anthiyur Consumer Co-operative Store Limited vs. R. Parthiban WA No. 1402/2024,on October 17, 2024, upheld the labour court’s order setting aside the termination of an employee following an inquiry into alleged misconduct. The Court further emphasized...
Madras High Court in MRB Nurses Empowerment Association vs. The Principal Secretary and Ors., W.P. No. 27556/2018,on October 18, 2024, rejected the employer’s argument that nurses are only eligible for casual leave as prescribed in their appointment and posting orders. The Court ruled that...



