Punjab & Haryana HC in the case of Punjab Land Development & Reclamation Corporation Workers’ Union Ludhiana vs. Punjab Agro Industries Corporation Ltd & Ors. (LPA-2872-2024), recently ruled that retrenched contractual workers cannot claim reinstatement solely due to land transfer resulting from a failed amalgamation. Referring to Section 2(oo) of the ID Act, the Court clarified that retrenchment does not include contract terminations consistent with contractual terms. Additionally, protection under Section 25-N of the ID Act applies only to employees with at least one year of continuous service, which was not satisfied in the present case.
News Section
No reinstatement to contractual workers because of land transfer from failed amalgamation: Punjab and Haryana High Court
04/08/2025


Book Shop
Submit Your Article
Would you like to share your views? submit your Aricle by clicking on the button below.
Submit your Article
Notifications
- UP Factories Amendment Act 2025 effective from 3.10.25
- Tamil Nadu Shops Act Amendments About Combined Annual Return
- Haryana Revised Minimum Wages from 1.11.25
- Chhattisgarh Government Amends Shops & Establishments Rules to Permit Women in Night Shifts w.e.f. 25.09.2025
- EPFO Mandates Display of Form 5A by Establishments
- Kerala MW Extended to New Employments and Kerala Factories Amendment Rules 2025
- Maharashtra Govt Amends Shops & Estab. Act w.e.f 1-10-25
- UP Minimum Wages – 1-10-2025



