Telangana High Court in Yeddandi Venkataiah vs. Prabhudas Kishore Das Tobacco Products Ltd. and Ors. CMA 2065/2002, while answering a question as to whether a ‘Beedi Roller’ is a workman within the definition of Section 2(n) of ECA observed that the activity of the deceased being the Beedi roller, clearly falls within the ambit of the term ‘workman’ as defined under Section 2(n) of the ECA read with Schedule-II of the ECA, which includes the person employed otherwise than in clerical capacity in any premises or within the precincts where the manufacturing process.


You may also like
08/10/2023
02/23/2024
06/05/2024
Author
NOTIFICATIONS
- Maharashtra Extend ESI Coverage to Educational and Hospital Sector
- Rectification of Erroneous EPS Contributions
- POSH Compliance Check List for Gurugram Workplaces
- Punjab Minimum Wages from 1.9.25
- Gujarat Shops and Establishments (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025
- The Rajasthan Shops And Commercial Establishments (Amendment) Ordinance 2025
- Erroneous EPS Contribution Rectification
- Minimum Wages Odisha w.e.f. 01-10-2025



Add comment