Himachal Pradesh High Court in Dr. Daljit Singh v. State of H.P. & Ors. (CWP No. 3374 of 2024) rejected the employer’s contention that employees, who were originally recruited as regular employees, cannot derive the benefits of enhanced retirement age, which was provided only to persons...
Layout B (with infinite scroll)
Jharkhand High Court in Pramod Kumar Sinha v. Chairman, Coal India Ltd. & Ors. (W.P.(S) No. 4411 of 2020 and W.P.(S) No. 1595 of 2021) held that premature retirement on disputed records during the pendency of an enquiry without due process amounts to misconduct by the enquiry officers as it...
Himachal Pradesh High Court in Hoshiar Singh v. State of H.P. & Ors. (CWPOA No. 749 of 2019)on August 12, 2025, held that disciplinary punishment involving civil consequences, such as forfeiture of service benefits, must be based on clear proof of misconduct or dereliction of duty. The case...
News Section
After promotion, disabled Employee entitled to Posting at Same Place under policy : Calcutta High Court
Calcutta High Court in Anirban Pal v. Punjab National Bank & Ors. (MAT 1380/2024)on August 14, 2025 held that a policy mandating that disabled employees remain posted at the same place even after promotion is binding on the employer, particularly when framed under statutory and international...
News Section
Wages not to be Denied for Detention Period if Employee is cleared in disciplinary proceedings and acquittal from court: Rajasthan High Court
Rajasthan High Court in Harbajan Singh vs. Superintendent of Police S. B. Civil WP No. 7146/2003, on August 14, 2025, directed that an employee be paid salary for the period spent in judicial custody on criminal charges unconnected to his official duties, emphasising that he was subsequently...
