Delhi HC in Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. vs. D.P. Sharma CM APPL. 16153/2023, dismissed the petition of an employee claiming voluntary resignation benefits on a higher pay scale, which was based on a single bench’s judgment that had set aside the order imposing punishment on the employee. The...
Layout B (with infinite scroll)
News Section
High court scope of interference in disciplinary proceedings is very limited: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court in the Sumer Singh vs. the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-Cum labour Court, Rohtak and Ors. CWP 14078/2000,on October 14, 2024, upheld the dismissal of an employee who had faced 52 departmental proceedings over 18 years and committed embezzlement even during...
Madras High Court in the Management, Anthiyur Consumer Co-operative Store Limited vs. R. Parthiban WA No. 1402/2024,on October 17, 2024, upheld the labour court’s order setting aside the termination of an employee following an inquiry into alleged misconduct. The Court further emphasized...
Madras High Court in MRB Nurses Empowerment Association vs. The Principal Secretary and Ors., W.P. No. 27556/2018,on October 18, 2024, rejected the employer’s argument that nurses are only eligible for casual leave as prescribed in their appointment and posting orders. The Court ruled that...
News Section
For Industrial court jurisdiction, a Claim by contract labour of a direct employee of the principal employer is a must: Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court in M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. v Maharashtra Shramjivi General Kamgar Union &Anr., W.P. No. 9664 of 2021,on October 22, 2024, addressed the issue of whether the Industrial Court has jurisdiction to entertain a complaint of unfair labour practice when there is a dispute regarding the...
