Karnataka High Court in Sri. G. Ramesh vs. The Karnataka State Seeds Corporation Ltd. (W.P No. 36199/2014), upheld disciplinary action against a delinquent employee who was absent from duty without authorization, emphasizing that employees are obligated to attend work during scheduled hours unless...
Layout B (with infinite scroll)
News Section
Filing appeal and withdrawal by employee does not amount to his intention of abandoning the claim of reinstatement: Bombay HC
Bombay High Court in Shri. Patil SamgondaNamgonda vs. The State of Maharashtra (W.P No. 4754/2009), On June 12, 2024 rejecting management’s argument that the employee’s withdrawal of appeals against the termination order constituted an abandonment of his reinstatement claim. The Court...
News Section
Commissioner under the Disabilities Act cannot restrict employers from retiring their employees: Rajasthan HC
Rajasthan High Court in Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs. The Commissioner Persons with Disabilities (W.P(C) No. 7936/2007), On June 16, 2024, reaffirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling in State Bank of Patiala &Ors. vs. Vinesh Kumar Bhasin (2010) 4 SCC 368. The High Court emphasized...
Kerala High Court in Sujith T.V. vs. Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. (W.P 4754/2009),On June 18, 2024, declined to grant relief to the employee regarding the employer’s decision to suspend and issue a warning. This decision stemmed from the employee’s admission of unauthorized...
This case study presents an overview of the leadership style in Jaipur Rugs, which has given the highest priority to the development of the weavers, who come from backward communities. Through a people-centric approach, this organization has been able to achieve remarkable success.
