Layout G – Page 111 – Business Manager

07/02/2026

Layout G (with load more button)

Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Pass Injunctive Relief In Industrial Disputes: Madras HC

Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Pass Injunctive Relief In Industrial Disputes: Madras HC

Nisha Samuel Joins Group Legrand India as VP-HR

People Movement

Nisha Samuel Joins Group Legrand India as VP-HR

Tanvi Choksi joins Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India Limited as CHRO

People Movement

Tanvi Choksi joins Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India Limited as CHRO

Workman to prove 240 days of working, no adverse inference to be drawn against employer for nonproduction of records: Raj. HC

Workman to prove 240 days of working, no adverse inference to be drawn against employer for nonproduction of records: Raj. HC

Employer can't recover excess amount paid to employee after long delay: Delhi HC

Employer can’t recover excess amount paid to employee after long delay: Delhi HC

Gratuity not to be paid in installments: Kerala HC

Gratuity not to be paid in installments: Kerala HC

Person claiming the establishment as industry has to prove it also: Delhi HC

Person claiming the establishment as industry has to prove it also: Delhi HC

The interest rate on delayed gratuity payment has no relevance with changing interest rates on fixed deposits: Jharkhand HC

The interest rate on delayed gratuity payment has no relevance with changing interest rates on fixed deposits: Jharkhand HC

Employee Entitled to Medical Reimbursement Even if Hospital is Not Empaneled: Delhi HC

Employee Entitled to Medical Reimbursement Even if Hospital is Not Empaneled: Delhi HC

Past record relevant for deciding punishment: Bombay HC

Past record relevant for deciding punishment: Bombay HC

On the ground of pending chargesheet, leave encashment can’t be denied: Delhi HC

On the ground of pending chargesheet, leave encashment can’t be denied: Delhi HC

For establishing employer- employee relationship, mere filing affidavit is not sufficient: MP HC

For establishing employer- employee relationship, mere filing affidavit is not sufficient: MP HC

error: Content is protected !!