Supreme Court in Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs vs. the State of Goa and Anr. C.A. No. 4100/2022, while hearing an appeal assailing on the decision of the Bombay High Court which denied the back wages for the period of two extra years of work and arrears of pension to employees on the ground that the employees ought to have been superannuated/retired at the age of 60 (sixty) years instead of 58 (fifty eight) years, observed that although the High Court may be right and/or justified in denying any salary for the period of two extra years to the employees if they would have continued in service, on the ground of delay, however, as far as the pension is concerned, it is a continuous cause of action, there is no justification at all for denying the arrears of pension.


You may also like
08/12/2024
04/27/2022
News Section
58% of Indian tech talent prefer remote work opportunity even at a lesser salary: Report
10/05/2023
Author
February 2026

Notifications
- Maharashtra Extend ESI Coverage to Educational and Hospital Sector
- Rectification of Erroneous EPS Contributions
- POSH Compliance Check List for Gurugram Workplaces
- Punjab Minimum Wages from 1.9.25
- Gujarat Shops and Establishments (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025
- The Rajasthan Shops And Commercial Establishments (Amendment) Ordinance 2025
- Erroneous EPS Contribution Rectification
- Minimum Wages Odisha w.e.f. 01-10-2025


Add comment