Supreme Court in Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs vs. the State of Goa and Anr. C.A. No. 4100/2022, while hearing an appeal assailing on the decision of the Bombay High Court which denied the back wages for the period of two extra years of work and arrears of pension to employees on the ground that the employees ought to have been superannuated/retired at the age of 60 (sixty) years instead of 58 (fifty eight) years, observed that although the High Court may be right and/or justified in denying any salary for the period of two extra years to the employees if they would have continued in service, on the ground of delay, however, as far as the pension is concerned, it is a continuous cause of action, there is no justification at all for denying the arrears of pension.


You may also like
12/01/2023
News Section
EPFO enables employees to delete and re-submit application for validation of option/joint option
05/09/2023
12/18/2023
Author
June 2026

Notifications
- Revision of Minimum Wages Notification 01.05.2026
- UP Revised Minimum Wages from 01.04.2026
- The Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act 1958
- Revised Minimum Wages of Haryana with effect from 01.04.2026
- MP Minimum Wage 01-04-2026 to 30-09-2026
- Uttar Pradesh Minimum Wages Notification April 2026 to Sept. 2026
- Delhi Shops Amendment Act 2026
- Gujarat Shops Act Amendment 2026


Add comment