Bombay High Court, in Air India Charters Ltd. v. Ms. Tanja Glusica & Ors., F.A. No. 1854 of 2013, addressed the calculation of compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 (“EC Act “). The Court highlighted that the computation must align with the salary actually...
Layout B (with infinite scroll)
Madhya Pradesh High Court, in Kali Charna Sabat vs. Union of India, W.P. No. 10021 of 2024, emphasized the necessity of adherence to procedural fairness in inquiries under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The case involved allegations of...
Bombay High Court, in Maharashtra State Cooperative Cotton Growers’ Marketing Federation Ltd. vs. Appellate Tribunal, Employees Provident Fund, W.P. No. 1268 of 2011, addressed the scope of “basic wages” under the EPF Act. The case arose from the employer’s contention that...
News Section
Employee joining another organisation by remaining absent and not informing the present employer would be voluntary abandonment: Supreme Court
Supreme Court, in Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. vs. Om Parkash, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4393/2010, overturned a High Court order that reinstated an employee with consequential benefits. The High Court had earlier ruled that the termination was invalid as no inquiry was conducted into the...
News Section
Set up ICCs in all government departments, PSUs: Supreme Court on PoSH Act implementation
The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued detailed directions to ensure effective implementation of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) [Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa and Ors] A Bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and N Kotiswar...
